Wednesday, 21 October 2009

NEVER MIND THE AUROCHS

The Aurochs has played an extremely important part of human lives for thousands of years. In it’s wild state it was hunted to provide food, leather and tendons for bow strings. After being domesticated, it now decides the fate of billions of people worldwide thanks to its meat. At an estimated 1.53bn cattle in 2001, the species is clearly of massive importance in the modern world.

But back to the Aurochs. It is probable that it was domesticated 8,000-6,000 years ago by a number of different cultures around the world. It was exterminated in Britain somewhere between 4,100-2,750 years ago (or the Bronze age if you would like), but in the 13th century (AD), the Aurochs was only left, in its wild state, in eastern Europe. In 1564, gamekeepers surveyed the lands and found 38 cattle. In 1627 the last female died, and the wild species became extinct.

Anyway, that is the background to the story. This morning, whilst researching Vampire Bat control, I got distracted and ended up reading Walker’s Mammals of the World (1999). It was here that I got distracted again by Artiodactyls, and got reading about wild cattle. The author then mentioned something extraordinary. Harrison (1972) had discussed possible Aurochs late survival in Iraq. D. L. Harrison had written in “The Mammals of Arabia” that the Aurochs could have survived into the early 20th century in Iraq. After googling this, I can find the book for sale, but there is nothing about late Aurochs survival in Iraq. No website mentions it, only to say that the Aurochs probably became extinct in the Middle East and surrounding areas a few thousand years ago. Is there anyone out there who knows more about this, or would have access to a copy of the book? Please please let me know if you can, this could be a very interesting bit of sort-of crypto information.

A taxonomic footnote: Although it is usually given the name of Bos taurus, domesticated cattle have more resently been fitted into B. primigenius. European cattle developed from the subspecies B. p. primigenius, whilst the Indian Zebu was developed from B. p. namadicus. I have tried to avoid giving anything a scientific name in this blog; chances are when it comes out the taxonomy will be out of date!

6 comments:

  1. Gloucestershire county libraries and the British library appear to have a copies of the book which should be obtainable by inter-library loan, so why not try that if you don't fancy spending £65 on a certain online book retailer.
    Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you aware of the Chillingham herd in Northumberland? These are wild cattle, and are thought to be closely related to aurochs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. not to mention the 'Heck ' cattle in Devon, sort of miniature Aurochs looklikes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had a teacher who both looked and behaved like an aurochs. Hybridisation?

    Ronan Coghlan

    ReplyDelete
  5. The aurochs
    Won't fit in a box
    Unlike the fox
    Or a pair of socks

    But, if it's in a drunken state,
    You can maybe stick it in a crate.

    William Shakespeare

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi everyone, This site is excellent and so is how the subject matter was explained. I like some of the comments too although I would suggest everyone stays on the subject matter so that to add value to the message.

    ReplyDelete